The California Environmental Defense Firm’s Workplace of Environmental Health Threat Assessment (OEHHA) just recently launched a file called Proof on the Carcinogenicity of Fluoride and Its Salts that highlights the many health threats triggered by the consumption of fluoride. And the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) just recently sent a collection of its own to OEHHA, which is quickly to make a decision concerning fluoride’s toxicity, providing additional evidence that fluoride triggers cancer.
FAN has been working for several years to raise awareness about the toxicity of fluoride, with the eventual goal of getting it got rid of from public water materials. And its latest efforts including OEHHA could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, so to speak, as it has the possible to unleash the reality about fluoride on an enormous scale, and stimulate a revolt versus its use.
According to a recent FAN news release, OEHHA’s report was birthed from a query into the science of fluoride’s toxicity. It is also a start to the group’s clinical board of advisers Carcinogen Identification Committee (CIC) meeting to be hung on October 12 – 13, 2011, which will make a choice on the status of fluoride as a carcinogen.
The OEHHA report currently states that “several lines of evidence (program) that fluoride is integrated into bones where it can stimulate cell division of osteoblasts [bone-forming cells],” an admission that already acknowledges fluoride as a reason for bone cancer. The report goes on to state that fluoride induces “genetic modifications other cellular changes resulting in deadly transformation, and cellular immune action consequently increasing the risk of advancement of osteosarcomas.”
To contribute to this, FAN provided OEHHA with extra research studies from the National Research study Council (NRC), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and a number of esteemed universities that show a link between fluoride intake and different cancers, consisting of liver and oral cancers, and thyroid follicular cell growths.
With this mountain of evidence, the only logical conclusion OEHHA can come to in October is that fluoride is a hazardous toxin – and similar to lead and other known hazardous chemicals already are in California, worthwhile of being publicly recognized as hazardous.
“While we know that there will be remarkable pressure placed on the CIC and OEHHA by the proponents of fluoride and fluoridation, we ask that the Committee continue to count on its high level of scientific understanding and stability when pondering and reaching a last conclusion on the carcinogenicity status of fluoride and its salts,” composed FAN as part of its main submission.